GHSA-3RCQ-39XP-7XJP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-05-21 14:49 – Updated: 2024-12-04 16:23Impact
When storing unbounded types in a BTreeMap, a node is represented as a linked list of "memory chunks". It was discovered recently that when we deallocate a node, in some cases only the first memory chunk is deallocated, and the rest of the memory chunks remain (incorrectly) allocated, causing a memory leak.
In the worst case, depending on how a canister uses the BTreeMap, an adversary could interact with the canister through its API and trigger interactions with the map that keep consuming memory due to the memory leak. This could potentially lead to using an excessive amount of memory, or even running out of memory.
This issue has been fixed in #212 by changing the logic for deallocating nodes to ensure that all of a node's memory chunks are deallocated. Tests have been added to prevent regressions of this nature moving forward.
Note: Users of stable-structure < 0.6.0 are not affected.
Patches
The problem has been fixed in PR #212 and users are asked to upgrade to version 0.6.4.
Workarounds
Users who are not storing unbounded types in BTreeMap are not affected and do not need to upgrade. Otherwise, an upgrade to version 0.6.4 is necessary.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "crates.io",
"name": "ic-stable-structures"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.6.0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.6.4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-4435"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-401"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-05-21T14:49:48Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2024-05-21T10:15:10Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Impact\nWhen storing unbounded types in a `BTreeMap`, a node is represented as a linked list of \"memory chunks\". It was discovered recently that when we deallocate a node, in some cases only the first memory chunk is deallocated, and the rest of the memory chunks remain (incorrectly) allocated, causing a memory leak.\n\nIn the worst case, depending on how a canister uses the `BTreeMap`, an adversary could interact with the canister through its API and trigger interactions with the map that keep consuming memory due to the memory leak. This could potentially lead to using an excessive amount of memory, or even running out of memory. \n\nThis issue has been fixed in #212 by changing the logic for deallocating nodes to ensure that all of a node\u0027s memory chunks are deallocated. Tests have been added to prevent regressions of this nature moving forward.\n\n**Note:** Users of stable-structure \u003c 0.6.0 are not affected.\n\n### Patches\nThe problem has been fixed in PR #212 and users are asked to upgrade to version `0.6.4`.\n\n### Workarounds\nUsers who are not storing unbounded types in `BTreeMap` are not affected and do not need to upgrade. Otherwise, an upgrade to version `0.6.4` is necessary.\n",
"id": "GHSA-3rcq-39xp-7xjp",
"modified": "2024-12-04T16:23:07Z",
"published": "2024-05-21T14:49:48Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/dfinity/stable-structures/security/advisories/GHSA-3rcq-39xp-7xjp"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-4435"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/dfinity/stable-structures/pull/212"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/dfinity/stable-structures/commit/4f6b8ae521884833498bae26369c353c10f28ea7"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://docs.rs/ic-stable-structures/0.6.4/ic_stable_structures"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/dfinity/stable-structures"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://internetcomputer.org/docs/current/developer-docs/smart-contracts/maintain/storage#stable-memory"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2024-0406.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "ic-stable-structures vulnerable to BTreeMap memory leak when deallocating nodes with overflows"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.