GHSA-3RW3-PFV7-M7R7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-09-27 15:30 – Updated: 2025-11-04 00:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5: Fix bridge mode operations when there are no VFs
Currently, trying to set the bridge mode attribute when numvfs=0 leads to a crash:
bridge link set dev eth2 hwmode vepa
[ 168.967392] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000030 [...] [ 168.969989] RIP: 0010:mlx5_add_flow_rules+0x1f/0x300 [mlx5_core] [...] [ 168.976037] Call Trace: [ 168.976188] [ 168.978620] _mlx5_eswitch_set_vepa_locked+0x113/0x230 [mlx5_core] [ 168.979074] mlx5_eswitch_set_vepa+0x7f/0xa0 [mlx5_core] [ 168.979471] rtnl_bridge_setlink+0xe9/0x1f0 [ 168.979714] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x159/0x400 [ 168.980451] netlink_rcv_skb+0x54/0x100 [ 168.980675] netlink_unicast+0x241/0x360 [ 168.980918] netlink_sendmsg+0x1f6/0x430 [ 168.981162] _syssendmsg+0x3bb/0x3f0 [ 168.982155] _sys_sendmsg+0x88/0xd0 [ 168.985036] __sys_sendmsg+0x59/0xa0 [ 168.985477] do_syscall_64+0x79/0x150 [ 168.987273] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 168.987773] RIP: 0033:0x7f8f7950f917
(esw->fdb_table.legacy.vepa_fdb is null)
The bridge mode is only relevant when there are multiple functions per port. Therefore, prevent setting and getting this setting when there are no VFs.
Note that after this change, there are no settings to change on the PF
interface using bridge link when there are no VFs, so the interface no
longer appears in the bridge link output.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-46857"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-476"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-09-27T13:15:17Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet/mlx5: Fix bridge mode operations when there are no VFs\n\nCurrently, trying to set the bridge mode attribute when numvfs=0 leads to a\ncrash:\n\nbridge link set dev eth2 hwmode vepa\n\n[ 168.967392] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000030\n[...]\n[ 168.969989] RIP: 0010:mlx5_add_flow_rules+0x1f/0x300 [mlx5_core]\n[...]\n[ 168.976037] Call Trace:\n[ 168.976188] \u003cTASK\u003e\n[ 168.978620] _mlx5_eswitch_set_vepa_locked+0x113/0x230 [mlx5_core]\n[ 168.979074] mlx5_eswitch_set_vepa+0x7f/0xa0 [mlx5_core]\n[ 168.979471] rtnl_bridge_setlink+0xe9/0x1f0\n[ 168.979714] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x159/0x400\n[ 168.980451] netlink_rcv_skb+0x54/0x100\n[ 168.980675] netlink_unicast+0x241/0x360\n[ 168.980918] netlink_sendmsg+0x1f6/0x430\n[ 168.981162] ____sys_sendmsg+0x3bb/0x3f0\n[ 168.982155] ___sys_sendmsg+0x88/0xd0\n[ 168.985036] __sys_sendmsg+0x59/0xa0\n[ 168.985477] do_syscall_64+0x79/0x150\n[ 168.987273] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e\n[ 168.987773] RIP: 0033:0x7f8f7950f917\n\n(esw-\u003efdb_table.legacy.vepa_fdb is null)\n\nThe bridge mode is only relevant when there are multiple functions per\nport. Therefore, prevent setting and getting this setting when there are no\nVFs.\n\nNote that after this change, there are no settings to change on the PF\ninterface using `bridge link` when there are no VFs, so the interface no\nlonger appears in the `bridge link` output.",
"id": "GHSA-3rw3-pfv7-m7r7",
"modified": "2025-11-04T00:31:32Z",
"published": "2024-09-27T15:30:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46857"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/505ae01f75f839b54329164bbfecf24cc1361b31"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/52c4beb79e095e0631b5cac46ed48a2aefe51985"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/65feee671e37f3b6eda0b6af28f204b5bcf7fa50"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b1d305abef4640af1b4f1b4774d513cd81b10cfc"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00001.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.