ghsa-3rxw-g5h2-cm9q
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-02 00:10
Modified
2022-05-02 00:10
Details
Heap-based buffer overflow in dhost.exe in Novell eDirectory 8.8 before 8.8.3, and 8.7.3 before 8.7.3.10 ftf1, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a SOAP request with a long Accept-Language header.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2008-4479" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2008-10-14T22:36:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in dhost.exe in Novell eDirectory 8.8 before 8.8.3, and 8.7.3 before 8.7.3.10 ftf1, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a SOAP request with a long Accept-Language header.", "id": "GHSA-3rxw-g5h2-cm9q", "modified": "2022-05-02T00:10:31Z", "published": "2022-05-02T00:10:31Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-4479" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/32111" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/4405" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://support.novell.com/docs/Readmes/InfoDocument/patchbuilder/readme_5037180.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://support.novell.com/docs/Readmes/InfoDocument/patchbuilder/readme_5037181.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.novell.com/support/php/search.do?cmd=displayKC\u0026docType=kc\u0026externalId=7000086\u0026sliceId=1\u0026docTypeID=DT_TID_1_1\u0026dialogID=78066829\u0026stateId=0%200%2078062953" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/497164/100/0/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1020989" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/2738" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-08-064" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.