ghsa-3v53-2g4c-6vpg
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:07
Modified
2022-05-13 01:07
Severity ?
9.8 (Critical) - CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Details

The pcre_compile2 function in pcre_compile.c in PCRE 8.38 mishandles the /((?:F?+(?:^(?(R)a+\"){99}-))(?J)(?'R'(?'R'<((?'RR'(?'R'){97)?J)?J)(?'R'(?'R'){99|(:(?|(?'R')(\k'R')|((?'R')))H'R'R)(H'R))))))/ pattern and related patterns with named subgroups, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer overflow) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted regular expression, as demonstrated by a JavaScript RegExp object encountered by Konqueror.

Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
   affected: [],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2016-1283",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [
         "CWE-119",
      ],
      github_reviewed: false,
      github_reviewed_at: null,
      nvd_published_at: "2016-01-03T00:59:00Z",
      severity: "CRITICAL",
   },
   details: "The pcre_compile2 function in pcre_compile.c in PCRE 8.38 mishandles the /((?:F?+(?:^(?(R)a+\\\"){99}-))(?J)(?'R'(?'R'<((?'RR'(?'R'\\){97)?J)?J)(?'R'(?'R'\\){99|(:(?|(?'R')(\\k'R')|((?'R')))H'R'R)(H'R))))))/ pattern and related patterns with named subgroups, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer overflow) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted regular expression, as demonstrated by a JavaScript RegExp object encountered by Konqueror.",
   id: "GHSA-3v53-2g4c-6vpg",
   modified: "2022-05-13T01:07:24Z",
   published: "2022-05-13T01:07:24Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-1283",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:1132",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa128",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1767",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201607-02",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2016-18",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2017-14",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-March/178193.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-March/178955.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinapr2016-2952098.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/79825",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1034555",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.slackware.com/security/viewer.php?l=slackware-security&y=2016&m=slackware-security.343110",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [
      {
         score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
         type: "CVSS_V3",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.