GHSA-3VCG-J39X-CWFM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-16 14:13 – Updated: 2025-05-16 14:13Impact
the slice() builtin can elide side effects when the output length is 0, and the source bytestring is a builtin (msg.data or <address>.code). the reason is that for these source locations, the check that length >= 1 is skipped:
https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/68b68c4b30c5ef2f312b4674676170b8a6eaa316/vyper/builtins/functions.py#L315-L319
the result is that a 0-length bytestring constructed with slice can be passed to make_byte_array_copier, which elides evaluation of its source argument when the max length is 0:
https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/68b68c4b30c5ef2f312b4674676170b8a6eaa316/vyper/codegen/core.py#L189-L191
the impact is that side effects in the start argument may be elided when the length argument is 0, e.g. slice(msg.data, self.do_side_effect(), 0).
the following example illustrates how the issue would look in user code
counter: public(uint256)
@external
def test() -> Bytes[10]:
b: Bytes[10] = slice(msg.data, self.side_effect(), 0)
return b
def side_effect() -> uint256:
self.counter += 1
return 0
the severity assigned is low, since this is not a very useful pattern and unlikely to be found in user code.
Patches
the fix is tracked in https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/4645, which disallows any invocation of slice() with length 0, including for the ad hoc locations discussed in this advisory.
Workarounds
Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?
References
Are there any links users can visit to find out more?
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "vyper"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "0.4.2rc1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-47774"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-691"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-05-16T14:13:29Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-05-15T18:15:38Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "### Impact\nthe `slice()` builtin can elide side effects when the output length is 0, and the source bytestring is a builtin (`msg.data` or `\u003caddress\u003e.code`). the reason is that for these source locations, the check that `length \u003e= 1` is skipped:\nhttps://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/68b68c4b30c5ef2f312b4674676170b8a6eaa316/vyper/builtins/functions.py#L315-L319\n\nthe result is that a 0-length bytestring constructed with slice can be passed to `make_byte_array_copier`, which elides evaluation of its source argument when the max length is 0:\nhttps://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/68b68c4b30c5ef2f312b4674676170b8a6eaa316/vyper/codegen/core.py#L189-L191\n\nthe impact is that side effects in the `start` argument may be elided when the `length` argument is 0, e.g. `slice(msg.data, self.do_side_effect(), 0)`.\n\nthe following example illustrates how the issue would look in user code\n```vyper\ncounter: public(uint256)\n\n@external\ndef test() -\u003e Bytes[10]:\n b: Bytes[10] = slice(msg.data, self.side_effect(), 0)\n return b\n\ndef side_effect() -\u003e uint256:\n self.counter += 1\n return 0\n```\n\nthe severity assigned is low, since this is not a very useful pattern and unlikely to be found in user code.\n\n### Patches\n\nthe fix is tracked in https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/4645, which disallows any invocation of `slice()` with length 0, including for the ad hoc locations discussed in this advisory.\n\n### Workarounds\n_Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?_\n\n### References\n_Are there any links users can visit to find out more?_",
"id": "GHSA-3vcg-j39x-cwfm",
"modified": "2025-05-16T14:13:29Z",
"published": "2025-05-16T14:13:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-3vcg-j39x-cwfm"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-47774"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/4645"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/68b68c4b30c5ef2f312b4674676170b8a6eaa316/vyper/builtins/functions.py#L315-L319"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/68b68c4b30c5ef2f312b4674676170b8a6eaa316/vyper/codegen/core.py#L189-L191"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Vyper\u0027s `slice()` may elide side-effects when output length is 0"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.