ghsa-3vpr-mhgf-fgjv
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:47
Modified
2022-05-13 01:47
Details

The ASN.1 parser in strongSwan before 5.5.3 improperly handles CHOICE types when the x509 plugin is enabled, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via a crafted certificate.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2017-9023"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2017-06-08T16:29:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The ASN.1 parser in strongSwan before 5.5.3 improperly handles CHOICE types when the x509 plugin is enabled, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via a crafted certificate.",
  "id": "GHSA-3vpr-mhgf-fgjv",
  "modified": "2022-05-13T01:47:47Z",
  "published": "2022-05-13T01:47:47Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-9023"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.strongswan.org/blog/2017/05/30/strongswan-vulnerability-(cve-2017-9023).html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3866"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/98756"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-3301-1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.