GHSA-3WHM-J4XM-RV8X
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-02-06 18:31 – Updated: 2025-02-21 18:31
VLAI?
Details
Due to the usage of a variable time instruction in the assembly implementation of an internal function, a small number of bits of secret scalars are leaked on the ppc64le architecture. Due to the way this function is used, we do not believe this leakage is enough to allow recovery of the private key when P-256 is used in any well known protocols.
Severity ?
8.4 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-22866"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-02-06T17:15:21Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Due to the usage of a variable time instruction in the assembly implementation of an internal function, a small number of bits of secret scalars are leaked on the ppc64le architecture. Due to the way this function is used, we do not believe this leakage is enough to allow recovery of the private key when P-256 is used in any well known protocols.",
"id": "GHSA-3whm-j4xm-rv8x",
"modified": "2025-02-21T18:31:07Z",
"published": "2025-02-06T18:31:05Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22866"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://go.dev/cl/643735"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://go.dev/issue/71383"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/xU1ZCHUZw3k"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2025-3447"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20250221-0002"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…