GHSA-44CC-C4HQ-R7VV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:06 – Updated: 2025-04-12 12:45
VLAI?
Details
The FancyBox for WordPress plugin before 3.0.3 for WordPress does not properly restrict access, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via an mfbfw[*] parameter in an update action to wp-admin/admin-post.php, as demonstrated by the mfbfw[padding] parameter and exploited in the wild in February 2015.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-1494"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-79"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2015-02-17T15:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The FancyBox for WordPress plugin before 3.0.3 for WordPress does not properly restrict access, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via an mfbfw[*] parameter in an update action to wp-admin/admin-post.php, as demonstrated by the mfbfw[padding] parameter and exploited in the wild in February 2015.",
"id": "GHSA-44cc-c4hq-r7vv",
"modified": "2025-04-12T12:45:26Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:06:06Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-1494"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/1082625"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wordpress.org/plugins/fancybox-for-wordpress/changelog"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wordpress.org/support/topic/possible-malware-2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://blog.sucuri.net/2015/02/zero-day-in-the-fancybox-for-wordpress-plugin.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/show/osvdb/118543"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/36087"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/02/05/10"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/72506"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…