GHSA-44WH-Q63Q-2624
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-05 02:48 – Updated: 2025-04-12 12:34
VLAI
Details
libpam-pgsql (aka pam_pgsql) 0.7 does not properly handle a NULL value returned by the password search query, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via a crafted password.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2013-0191"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-287"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2014-06-03T14:55:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "libpam-pgsql (aka pam_pgsql) 0.7 does not properly handle a NULL value returned by the password search query, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via a crafted password.",
"id": "GHSA-44wh-q63q-2624",
"modified": "2025-04-12T12:34:25Z",
"published": "2022-05-05T02:48:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-0191"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/81363"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00010.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00040.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2013/q1/86"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2013/q1/99"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://sourceforge.net/p/pam-pgsql/bugs/13"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://sourceforge.net/u/lvella/pam-pgsql/ci/9361f5970e5dd90a747319995b67c2f73b91448c"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/57440"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…