ghsa-45px-6f9w-fmpf
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-03 03:14
Modified
2022-05-03 03:14
Details
Stack-based buffer overflow in libTIFF before 3.7.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a TIFF file with a malformed BitsPerSample tag.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2005-1544" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2005-05-14T04:00:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Stack-based buffer overflow in libTIFF before 3.7.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a TIFF file with a malformed BitsPerSample tag.", "id": "GHSA-45px-6f9w-fmpf", "modified": "2022-05-03T03:14:11Z", "published": "2022-05-03T03:14:11Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-1544" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/20533" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91584" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://bugzilla.remotesensing.org/show_bug.cgi?id=843" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/15320" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/16872" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/18289" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/18943" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1013944" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2005/dsa-755" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200505-07.xml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2006:042" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/16350" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/13585" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-130-1" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.