ghsa-468w-8x39-gj5v
Vulnerability from github
Impact
There is a potential vulnerability in Traefik managing the TLS connections.
A router configured with a not well-formatted TLSOption is exposed with an empty TLSOption.
For instance, a route secured using an mTLS connection set with a wrong CA file is exposed without verifying the client certificates.
Patches
https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v2.9.6
Workarounds
Check the logs to detect the following error messages and fix your TLS options:
- Empty CA:
{"level":"error","msg":"invalid clientAuthType: RequireAndVerifyClientCert, CAFiles is required","routerName":"Router0@file"}
- Bad CA content (or bad path):
{"level":"error","msg":"invalid certificate(s) content","routerName":"Router0@file"}
- Unknown Client Auth Type:
{"level":"error","msg":"unknown client auth type \"FooClientAuthType\"","routerName":"Router0@file"}
- Invalid cipherSuites
{"level":"error","msg":"invalid CipherSuite: foobar","routerName":"Router0@file"}
- Invalid curvePreferences
{"level":"error","msg":"invalid CurveID in curvePreferences: foobar","routerName":"Router0@file"}
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, please open an issue.
{ affected: [ { package: { ecosystem: "Go", name: "github.com/traefik/traefik/v2", }, ranges: [ { events: [ { introduced: "0", }, { fixed: "2.9.6", }, ], type: "ECOSYSTEM", }, ], }, ], aliases: [ "CVE-2022-46153", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-295", ], github_reviewed: true, github_reviewed_at: "2022-12-08T16:11:12Z", nvd_published_at: "2022-12-08T22:15:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "## Impact\n\nThere is a potential vulnerability in Traefik managing the TLS connections.\n\nA router configured with a not well-formatted [TLSOption](https://doc.traefik.io/traefik/v2.9/https/tls/#tls-options) is exposed with an empty TLSOption.\n\nFor instance, a route secured using an mTLS connection set with a wrong CA file is exposed without verifying the client certificates.\n\n## Patches\n\nhttps://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v2.9.6\n\n## Workarounds\n\nCheck the logs to detect the following error messages and fix your TLS options:\n\n- Empty CA:\n\n```\n{\"level\":\"error\",\"msg\":\"invalid clientAuthType: RequireAndVerifyClientCert, CAFiles is required\",\"routerName\":\"Router0@file\"}\n```\n\n- Bad CA content (or bad path):\n\n```\n{\"level\":\"error\",\"msg\":\"invalid certificate(s) content\",\"routerName\":\"Router0@file\"}\n```\n\n- Unknown Client Auth Type:\n\n```\n{\"level\":\"error\",\"msg\":\"unknown client auth type \\\"FooClientAuthType\\\"\",\"routerName\":\"Router0@file\"}\n```\n\n- Invalid cipherSuites\n\n```\n{\"level\":\"error\",\"msg\":\"invalid CipherSuite: foobar\",\"routerName\":\"Router0@file\"}\n```\n\n- Invalid curvePreferences\n\n```\n{\"level\":\"error\",\"msg\":\"invalid CurveID in curvePreferences: foobar\",\"routerName\":\"Router0@file\"}\n``` \n\n## For more information\n\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory, please [open an issue](https://github.com/traefik/traefik/issues).", id: "GHSA-468w-8x39-gj5v", modified: "2022-12-12T22:26:28Z", published: "2022-12-08T16:11:12Z", references: [ { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/security/advisories/GHSA-468w-8x39-gj5v", }, { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-46153", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/commit/7e3fe48b80083b41e9ff82a474a36484cabc701a", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://doc.traefik.io/traefik/v2.9/https/tls/#tls-options", }, { type: "PACKAGE", url: "https://github.com/traefik/traefik", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v2.9.6", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], summary: "Traefik routes exposed with an empty TLSOption", }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.