ghsa-468w-rc5f-76wx
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-08-16 00:00
Modified
2022-08-17 00:00
Severity ?
Details
Apache OpenOffice supports the storage of passwords for web connections in the user's configuration database. The stored passwords are encrypted with a single master key provided by the user. A flaw in OpenOffice existed where master key was poorly encoded resulting in weakening its entropy from 128 to 43 bits making the stored passwords vulnerable to a brute force attack if an attacker has access to the users stored config. This issue affects: Apache OpenOffice versions prior to 4.1.13. Reference: CVE-2022-26307 - LibreOffice
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2022-37401" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-312", "CWE-326", "CWE-331" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2022-08-15T11:21:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Apache OpenOffice supports the storage of passwords for web connections in the user\u0027s configuration database. The stored passwords are encrypted with a single master key provided by the user. A flaw in OpenOffice existed where master key was poorly encoded resulting in weakening its entropy from 128 to 43 bits making the stored passwords vulnerable to a brute force attack if an attacker has access to the users stored config. This issue affects: Apache OpenOffice versions prior to 4.1.13. Reference: CVE-2022-26307 - LibreOffice", "id": "GHSA-468w-rc5f-76wx", "modified": "2022-08-17T00:00:22Z", "published": "2022-08-16T00:00:31Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-37401" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.openoffice.org/security/cves/CVE-2022-37401.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/08/13/2" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.