ghsa-4725-mf58-37j2
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 01:55
Modified
2022-05-14 01:55
Details
Buffer overflow in ftpd in IBM AIX 5.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long NLST command.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2010-3187" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2010-08-30T20:00:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Buffer overflow in ftpd in IBM AIX 5.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long NLST command.", "id": "GHSA-4725-mf58-37j2", "modified": "2022-05-14T01:55:59Z", "published": "2022-05-14T01:55:59Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-3187" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A11697" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/ftpd_advisory.asc" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Jul/281" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Jul/317" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Jul/324" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Jul/337" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1024368" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/14409" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/14456" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1IZ83252" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1IZ83274" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1IZ83275" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1IZ83276" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/66576" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.