GHSA-477X-W7M6-C6PH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2020-02-04 22:37 – Updated: 2021-08-19 16:52
VLAI?
Summary
Improper input validation in Apache Olingo
Details
The AsyncResponseWrapperImpl class in Apache Olingo versions 4.0.0 to 4.6.0 reads the Retry-After header and passes it to the Thread.sleep() method without any check. If a malicious server returns a huge value in the header, then it can help to implement a DoS attack.
Severity ?
7.5 (High)
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 4.6.0"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.apache.olingo:odata-client-core"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.7.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-17555"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2020-02-04T22:19:48Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The AsyncResponseWrapperImpl class in Apache Olingo versions 4.0.0 to 4.6.0 reads the Retry-After header and passes it to the Thread.sleep() method without any check. If a malicious server returns a huge value in the header, then it can help to implement a DoS attack.",
"id": "GHSA-477x-w7m6-c6ph",
"modified": "2021-08-19T16:52:56Z",
"published": "2020-02-04T22:37:15Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-17555"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/olingo-odata4/pull/61"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OLINGO-1411"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/olingo-user/201912.mbox/%3CCAGSZ4d65UmudJ_MQkFXEv9YY_wwZbRA3sgtNDzMoLM51Qh%3DRCA%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Improper input validation in Apache Olingo"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…