ghsa-47gj-9v97-r4c7
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 00:28
Modified
2022-05-17 00:28
Details

Libgcrypt before 1.5.4, as used in GnuPG and other products, does not properly perform ciphertext normalization and ciphertext randomization, which makes it easier for physically proximate attackers to conduct key-extraction attacks by leveraging the ability to collect voltage data from exposed metal, a different vector than CVE-2013-4576.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2014-5270"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-200"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2014-10-10T01:55:00Z",
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "Libgcrypt before 1.5.4, as used in GnuPG and other products, does not properly perform ciphertext normalization and ciphertext randomization, which makes it easier for physically proximate attackers to conduct key-extraction attacks by leveraging the ability to collect voltage data from exposed metal, a different vector than CVE-2013-4576.",
  "id": "GHSA-47gj-9v97-r4c7",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T00:28:35Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T00:28:35Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-5270"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-announce/2014q3/000352.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/08/16/2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.cs.tau.ac.il/~tromer/handsoff"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2014/dsa-3024"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2014/dsa-3073"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.