ghsa-47rg-xchh-xj5g
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 04:51
Modified
2022-05-17 04:51
Details
The bdrv_open function in Qemu 1.0 does not properly handle the failure of the mkstemp function, when in snapshot node, which allows local users to overwrite or read arbitrary files via a symlink attack on an unspecified temporary file.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2012-2652" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2012-08-07T20:55:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The bdrv_open function in Qemu 1.0 does not properly handle the failure of the mkstemp function, when in snapshot node, which allows local users to overwrite or read arbitrary files via a symlink attack on an unspecified temporary file.", "id": "GHSA-47rg-xchh-xj5g", "modified": "2022-05-17T04:51:08Z", "published": "2022-05-17T04:51:08Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-2652" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://git.kernel.org/?p=virt/kvm/qemu-kvm.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=eba25057b9a5e19d10ace2bc7716667a31297169" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://git.kernel.org/?p=virt/kvm/qemu-kvm.git;a=commit;h=eba25057b9a5e19d10ace2bc7716667a31297169" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu-stable-0.15.git%3Ba=log" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu-stable-0.15.git;a=log" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-09/msg00024.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/50132" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/50689" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2545" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/53725" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1522-1" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.