ghsa-485m-m88q-h824
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:11
Modified
2022-05-13 01:11
Severity ?
Details
Integer overflow in tools/tiffcp.c in LibTIFF 4.0.7, 3.9.3, 3.9.4, 3.9.5, 3.9.6, 3.9.7, 4.0.0alpha4, 4.0.0alpha5, 4.0.0alpha6, 4.0.0beta7, 4.0.0, 4.0.1, 4.0.2, 4.0.3, 4.0.4, 4.0.4beta, 4.0.5 and 4.0.6 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via a crafted image, which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2016-10093" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2017-03-01T15:59:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Integer overflow in tools/tiffcp.c in LibTIFF 4.0.7, 3.9.3, 3.9.4, 3.9.5, 3.9.6, 3.9.7, 4.0.0alpha4, 4.0.0alpha5, 4.0.0alpha6, 4.0.0beta7, 4.0.0, 4.0.1, 4.0.2, 4.0.3, 4.0.4, 4.0.4beta, 4.0.5 and 4.0.6 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via a crafted image, which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow.", "id": "GHSA-485m-m88q-h824", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:11:29Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:11:29Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-10093" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/vadz/libtiff/commit/787c0ee906430b772f33ca50b97b8b5ca070faec" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2017/01/01/libtiff-multiple-heap-based-buffer-overflow" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/Hack-Me/Pocs_for_Multi_Versions/tree/main/CVE-2016-10093" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2610" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3762" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/01/01/10" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/01/01/12" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95215" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.