GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-48F7-49JV-JJ2V

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-16 15:34 – Updated: 2026-09-14 12:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

md/md-bitmap: fix wrong bitmap_limit for clustermd when write sb

In clustermd, separate write-intent-bitmaps are used for each cluster node:

0 4k 8k 12k

| idle | md super | bm super [0] + bits | | bm bits[0, contd] | bm super[1] + bits | bm bits[1, contd] | | bm super[2] + bits | bm bits [2, contd] | bm super[3] + bits | | bm bits [3, contd] | | |

So in node 1, pg_index in __write_sb_page() could equal to bitmap->storage.file_pages. Then bitmap_limit will be calculated to 0. md_super_write() will be called with 0 size. That means the first 4k sb area of node 1 will never be updated through filemap_write_page(). This bug causes hang of mdadm/clustermd_tests/01r1_Grow_resize.

Here use (pg_index % bitmap->storage.file_pages) to make calculation of bitmap_limit correct.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-22124"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-04-16T15:16:06Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmd/md-bitmap: fix wrong bitmap_limit for clustermd when write sb\n\nIn clustermd, separate write-intent-bitmaps are used for each cluster\nnode:\n\n0                    4k                     8k                    12k\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n| idle                | md super            | bm super [0] + bits |\n| bm bits[0, contd]   | bm super[1] + bits  | bm bits[1, contd]   |\n| bm super[2] + bits  | bm bits [2, contd]  | bm super[3] + bits  |\n| bm bits [3, contd]  |                     |                     |\n\nSo in node 1, pg_index in __write_sb_page() could equal to\nbitmap-\u003estorage.file_pages. Then bitmap_limit will be calculated to\n0. md_super_write() will be called with 0 size.\nThat means the first 4k sb area of node 1 will never be updated\nthrough filemap_write_page().\nThis bug causes hang of mdadm/clustermd_tests/01r1_Grow_resize.\n\nHere use (pg_index % bitmap-\u003estorage.file_pages) to make calculation\nof bitmap_limit correct.",
  "id": "GHSA-48f7-49jv-jj2v",
  "modified": "2026-09-14T12:31:26Z",
  "published": "2025-04-16T15:34:45Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22124"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5eaf57fdfa37c869e61e9908e03edd707f9145b8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/60196f92bbc7901eb5cfa5d456651b87ea50a4a3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6130825f34d41718c98a9b1504a79a23e379701e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bc3a9788961631359527763d7e1fcf26554c7cb1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…