GHSA-495Q-R22G-59M9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-07-25 15:30 – Updated: 2025-11-19 21:31
VLAI?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
misc: tps6594-pfsm: Add NULL pointer check in tps6594_pfsm_probe()
The returned value, pfsm->miscdev.name, from devm_kasprintf() could be NULL. A pointer check is added to prevent potential NULL pointer dereference. This is similar to the fix in commit 3027e7b15b02 ("ice: Fix some null pointer dereference issues in ice_ptp.c").
This issue is found by our static analysis tool.
Severity ?
5.5 (Medium)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-38368"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-476"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-07-25T13:15:25Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmisc: tps6594-pfsm: Add NULL pointer check in tps6594_pfsm_probe()\n\nThe returned value, pfsm-\u003emiscdev.name, from devm_kasprintf()\ncould be NULL.\nA pointer check is added to prevent potential NULL pointer dereference.\nThis is similar to the fix in commit 3027e7b15b02\n(\"ice: Fix some null pointer dereference issues in ice_ptp.c\").\n\nThis issue is found by our static analysis tool.",
"id": "GHSA-495q-r22g-59m9",
"modified": "2025-11-19T21:31:16Z",
"published": "2025-07-25T15:30:51Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38368"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a10c8bff454b11ef553d9df19ee722d2df34cd0e"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a8d1b4f219e8833130927f19d1c8bfbf49215ce4"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a99b598d836c9c6411110c70a2da134c78d96e67"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d27ee5c59881a64ea92e363502742cb4f38b7460"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…