ghsa-497j-f639-7ww4
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 16:47
Modified
2024-04-04 00:53
Severity ?
Details
An integer underflow issue exists in ntfs-3g 2017.3.23. A local attacker could potentially exploit this by running /bin/ntfs-3g with specially crafted arguments from a specially crafted directory to cause a heap buffer overflow, resulting in a crash or the ability to execute arbitrary code. In installations where /bin/ntfs-3g is a setuid-root binary, this could lead to a local escalation of privileges.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2019-9755" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-191", "CWE-787" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2019-06-05T15:29:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "An integer underflow issue exists in ntfs-3g 2017.3.23. A local attacker could potentially exploit this by running /bin/ntfs-3g with specially crafted arguments from a specially crafted directory to cause a heap buffer overflow, resulting in a crash or the ability to execute arbitrary code. In installations where /bin/ntfs-3g is a setuid-root binary, this could lead to a local escalation of privileges.", "id": "GHSA-497j-f639-7ww4", "modified": "2024-04-04T00:53:14Z", "published": "2022-05-24T16:47:27Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-9755" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:3723" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2308" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3345" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202007-45" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.tuxera.com/community/release-history" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.