GHSA-497P-J4GH-26MW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-28 09:31 – Updated: 2026-08-28 09:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: enetc: fix potential divide-by-zero when num_vsi is zero
For i.MX94 series, all the standalone ENETCs do not support SR-IOV, so pf->caps.num_vsi is zero. This leads to a divide-by-zero in enetc4_default_rings_allocation() when distributing rings among PF and VFs.
Division by zero is undefined behavior in C. On ARM64, the UDIV/SDIV instructions silently return zero rather than raising an exception, so the issue does not cause a visible crash. However, relying on this behavior is incorrect and poses a cross-platform compatibility risk.
Add an explicit check for num_vsi == 0 and return early after the PF's rings have been configured.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-80610"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-08-28T08:16:44Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: enetc: fix potential divide-by-zero when num_vsi is zero\n\nFor i.MX94 series, all the standalone ENETCs do not support SR-IOV, so\npf-\u003ecaps.num_vsi is zero. This leads to a divide-by-zero in\nenetc4_default_rings_allocation() when distributing rings among PF and\nVFs.\n\nDivision by zero is undefined behavior in C. On ARM64, the UDIV/SDIV\ninstructions silently return zero rather than raising an exception, so\nthe issue does not cause a visible crash. However, relying on this\nbehavior is incorrect and poses a cross-platform compatibility risk.\n\nAdd an explicit check for num_vsi == 0 and return early after the PF\u0027s\nrings have been configured.",
"id": "GHSA-497p-j4gh-26mw",
"modified": "2026-08-28T09:31:46Z",
"published": "2026-08-28T09:31:46Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-80610"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5da65537792b68b6052ffcab65e04c27aea6dfe4"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cd37bcb67f909a8683cc8c38a63ac7367a7f6161"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.