GHSA-49C8-7MPF-M266

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-24 18:32 – Updated: 2026-06-28 09:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: qrtr: fix refcount saturation and potential UAF in qrtr_port_remove

In qrtr_port_remove(), the socket reference count is decremented via __sock_put() before the port is removed from the qrtr_ports XArray and before the RCU grace period elapses.

This breaks the fundamental RCU update paradigm. It exposes a race window where a concurrent RCU reader (such as qrtr_reset_ports() or qrtr_port_lookup()) can obtain a pointer to the socket from the XArray, and attempt to call sock_hold() on a socket whose reference count has already dropped to zero.

This exact race condition was hit during syzkaller fuzzing, leading to the following refcount saturation warning and a potential Use-After-Free:

refcount_t: saturated; leaking memory. WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1273 at lib/refcount.c:22 refcount_warn_saturate+0xae/0x1d0 Modules linked in: qrtr(+) bochs drm_shmem_helper ... Call Trace: qrtr_reset_ports net/qrtr/af_qrtr.c:768 [inline] [qrtr] __qrtr_bind.isra.0+0x48b/0x570 net/qrtr/af_qrtr.c:805 [qrtr] qrtr_bind+0x17d/0x210 net/qrtr/af_qrtr.c:901 [qrtr] kernel_bind+0xe4/0x120 net/socket.c:3592 qrtr_ns_init+0x1a6/0x380 net/qrtr/ns.c:715 [qrtr] qrtr_proto_init+0x3b/0xff0 net/qrtr/af_qrtr.c:169 [qrtr] do_one_initcall+0xf5/0x5e0 init/main.c:1283 ...

Fix this by deferring the reference count decrement until after the xa_erase() and the synchronize_rcu() complete.

(Note: The v1 of this patch incorrectly replaced __sock_put() with sock_put(). As Simon Horman pointed out, the callers of qrtr_port_remove() still hold a reference to the socket, so freeing the socket memory here would lead to a subsequent UAF in the caller. Thus, the __sock_put() is kept, but only repositioned to close the RCU race.)

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-52947"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-416"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-24T17:17:04Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: qrtr: fix refcount saturation and potential UAF in qrtr_port_remove\n\nIn qrtr_port_remove(), the socket reference count is decremented via\n__sock_put() before the port is removed from the qrtr_ports XArray and\nbefore the RCU grace period elapses.\n\nThis breaks the fundamental RCU update paradigm. It exposes a race\nwindow where a concurrent RCU reader (such as qrtr_reset_ports() or\nqrtr_port_lookup()) can obtain a pointer to the socket from the XArray,\nand attempt to call sock_hold() on a socket whose reference count has\nalready dropped to zero.\n\nThis exact race condition was hit during syzkaller fuzzing, leading to\nthe following refcount saturation warning and a potential Use-After-Free:\n\n  refcount_t: saturated; leaking memory.\n  WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1273 at lib/refcount.c:22 refcount_warn_saturate+0xae/0x1d0\n  Modules linked in: qrtr(+) bochs drm_shmem_helper ...\n  Call Trace:\n   \u003cTASK\u003e\n   qrtr_reset_ports net/qrtr/af_qrtr.c:768 [inline] [qrtr]\n   __qrtr_bind.isra.0+0x48b/0x570 net/qrtr/af_qrtr.c:805 [qrtr]\n   qrtr_bind+0x17d/0x210 net/qrtr/af_qrtr.c:901 [qrtr]\n   kernel_bind+0xe4/0x120 net/socket.c:3592\n   qrtr_ns_init+0x1a6/0x380 net/qrtr/ns.c:715 [qrtr]\n   qrtr_proto_init+0x3b/0xff0 net/qrtr/af_qrtr.c:169 [qrtr]\n   do_one_initcall+0xf5/0x5e0 init/main.c:1283\n   ...\n   \u003c/TASK\u003e\n\nFix this by deferring the reference count decrement until after the\nxa_erase() and the synchronize_rcu() complete.\n\n(Note: The v1 of this patch incorrectly replaced __sock_put() with\nsock_put(). As Simon Horman pointed out, the callers of qrtr_port_remove()\nstill hold a reference to the socket, so freeing the socket memory here\nwould lead to a subsequent UAF in the caller. Thus, the __sock_put() is\nkept, but only repositioned to close the RCU race.)",
  "id": "GHSA-49c8-7mpf-m266",
  "modified": "2026-06-28T09:31:37Z",
  "published": "2026-06-24T18:32:41Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52947"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/03bfa95e452e2b6ccd76a332060ae4feaf5ad84d"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2047c2aa0963bb2872fd722300a15bcb441a4c00"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2aa4c12723fe432e623462a3be42a197a128722b"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3b20ec8f31e8a6a6782243f473b0abd3463621df"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/474293d90880622fde9d2430fb0165767090f7b3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7de2d447072be3b1a76793f034432338fc9c494b"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a2171131ecda1ed61a594a1eb715e75fdad0fef5"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ab269990ed58143a92a263be1bee626d82ac03da"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…