GHSA-4C3J-3H7V-22Q9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-12 21:24 – Updated: 2025-11-12 21:24
VLAI?
Summary
changedetection.io: Stored XSS in Watch update via API
Details

Summary

A Stored Cross Site Scripting is present in the changedetection.io Watch update API due to unsufficient security checks.

Details

Tested on changedetection.io version v0.50.24

REPOSITORY                            TAG       IMAGE ID       CREATED        SIZE
ghcr.io/dgtlmoon/changedetection.io   latest    0367276509a0   23 hours ago   599MB

When a user tries to add an unsafe URL as a Watch in the changedetection.io UI, the action is blocked with the error message "Watch protocol is not permitted by SAFE_PROTOCOL_REGEX or incorrect URL format". This is catched by the function validate_url(test_url).

def validate_url(test_url):
    # ...
    from .model.Watch import is_safe_url
    if not is_safe_url(test_url):
        # This should be wtforms.validators.
        raise ValidationError('Watch protocol is not permitted by SAFE_PROTOCOL_REGEX or incorrect URL format')

When instead the Watch API is used, this check is not performed resulting in unsafe URLs added as Watch.

PoC

Update an existing watch with an unsafe URL

curl -X PUT "http://example.site/api/v1/watch/1242e1c5-d59e-4352-0078-203a55b21282" \
  -H "x-api-key: XXX" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "url": "javascript:alert(document.domain)",
    "title": "XSS PoC",
    "paused": false
  }'

Impact

Two scenarios are possibile:

  1. An attacker can insert a new watch with an arbitrary URL which really points to a web page. Once the HTML content is retrieved, the attacker updates the URL with a JavaScript payload.
  2. An attacker substitutes the URL in an existing watch with a new URL that is in reality a JavaScript payload.

When the user clicks on Preview and then on the malicious link, the JavaScript malicious code is executed.

poc1
poc2

Credits

Edoardo Ottavianelli @edoardottt

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "changedetection.io"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.50.34"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-62780"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-79"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-11-12T21:24:57Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-11-10T22:15:36Z",
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\nA Stored Cross Site Scripting is present in the changedetection.io Watch update API due to unsufficient security checks.\n\n### Details\n\nTested on changedetection.io version *v0.50.24*\n\n```console\nREPOSITORY                            TAG       IMAGE ID       CREATED        SIZE\nghcr.io/dgtlmoon/changedetection.io   latest    0367276509a0   23 hours ago   599MB\n```\n\nWhen a user tries to add an unsafe URL as a Watch in the changedetection.io UI, the action is blocked with the error message \"Watch protocol is not permitted by SAFE_PROTOCOL_REGEX or incorrect URL format\".\nThis is catched by the function `validate_url(test_url)`.\n\n```python\ndef validate_url(test_url):\n    # ...\n    from .model.Watch import is_safe_url\n    if not is_safe_url(test_url):\n        # This should be wtforms.validators.\n        raise ValidationError(\u0027Watch protocol is not permitted by SAFE_PROTOCOL_REGEX or incorrect URL format\u0027)\n```\n\nWhen instead the Watch API is used, this check is not performed resulting in unsafe URLs added as Watch.\n\n### PoC\n\nUpdate an existing watch with an unsafe URL\n```console\ncurl -X PUT \"http://example.site/api/v1/watch/1242e1c5-d59e-4352-0078-203a55b21282\" \\\n  -H \"x-api-key: XXX\" \\\n  -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n  -d \u0027{\n    \"url\": \"javascript:alert(document.domain)\",\n    \"title\": \"XSS PoC\",\n    \"paused\": false\n  }\u0027\n```\n\n### Impact\n\nTwo scenarios are possibile:\n\n1. An attacker can insert a new watch with an arbitrary URL which really points to a web page. Once the HTML content is retrieved, the attacker updates the URL with a JavaScript payload.\n2. An attacker substitutes the URL in an existing watch with a new URL that is in reality a JavaScript payload.\n\nWhen the user clicks on *Preview* and then on the malicious link, the JavaScript malicious code is executed.\n\n\u003cimg width=\"1200\" height=\"643\" alt=\"poc1\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/db81e0c7-b6d3-4332-b15d-a688a48c3227\" /\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cimg width=\"1200\" height=\"643\" alt=\"poc2\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e704b37c-d339-4322-9fc0-ad50dd86b31d\" /\u003e\n\n\n\n### Credits\n\nEdoardo Ottavianelli @edoardottt",
  "id": "GHSA-4c3j-3h7v-22q9",
  "modified": "2025-11-12T21:24:57Z",
  "published": "2025-11-12T21:24:57Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/dgtlmoon/changedetection.io/security/advisories/GHSA-4c3j-3h7v-22q9"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-62780"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/dgtlmoon/changedetection.io/issues/3562"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/dgtlmoon/changedetection.io/pull/3564"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/dgtlmoon/changedetection.io"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/dgtlmoon/changedetection.io/releases/tag/0.50.34"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "changedetection.io: Stored XSS in Watch update via API"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…