GHSA-4C6R-JQVH-F3HM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 03:04 – Updated: 2022-05-17 03:04
VLAI?
Details
Heap-based buffer overflow in the yy_get_next_buffer function in Flex before 2.6.1 might allow context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly execute arbitrary code via vectors involving num_to_read.
Severity ?
9.8 (Critical)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-6354"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2016-09-21T14:25:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in the yy_get_next_buffer function in Flex before 2.6.1 might allow context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly execute arbitrary code via vectors involving num_to_read.",
"id": "GHSA-4c6r-jqvh-f3hm",
"modified": "2022-05-17T03:04:51Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T03:04:51Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-6354"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/westes/flex/commit/a5cbe929ac3255d371e698f62dc256afe7006466"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201701-31"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3653"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/07/18/8"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/07/26/12"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…