GHSA-4C78-FXQ8-6RXG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:09 – Updated: 2025-04-20 03:46
VLAI?
Details
The IsDriveLetterAvailable method in Driver/Ntdriver.c in TrueCrypt 7.0, VeraCrypt before 1.15, and CipherShed, when running on Windows, does not properly validate drive letter symbolic links, which allows local users to mount an encrypted volume over an existing drive letter and gain privileges via an entry in the /GLOBAL?? directory.
Severity ?
7.8 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-7358"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-10-03T01:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The IsDriveLetterAvailable method in Driver/Ntdriver.c in TrueCrypt 7.0, VeraCrypt before 1.15, and CipherShed, when running on Windows, does not properly validate drive letter symbolic links, which allows local users to mount an encrypted volume over an existing drive letter and gain privileges via an entry in the /GLOBAL?? directory.",
"id": "GHSA-4c78-fxq8-6rxg",
"modified": "2025-04-20T03:46:07Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:09:07Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-7358"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://code.google.com/p/google-security-research/issues/detail?id=538"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://veracrypt.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=Release%20Notes"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/38403"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/133878/Truecrypt-7-Derived-Code-Windows-Drive-Letter-Symbolic-Link-Creation-Privilege-Escalation.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/09/22/7"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/09/24/3"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…