GHSA-4C9X-HWRM-39J5
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 03:57 – Updated: 2025-04-20 03:34
VLAI?
Details
Integer overflow in the jpc_pi_nextcprl function in jpc_t2cod.c in JasPer before 1.900.20 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via a crafted file, which triggers use of an uninitialized value.
Severity ?
7.8 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-10251"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-190"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-03-15T14:59:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Integer overflow in the jpc_pi_nextcprl function in jpc_t2cod.c in JasPer before 1.900.20 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via a crafted file, which triggers use of an uninitialized value.",
"id": "GHSA-4c9x-hwrm-39j5",
"modified": "2025-04-20T03:34:06Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T03:57:55Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-10251"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/mdadams/jasper/commit/1f0dfe5a42911b6880a1445f13f6d615ddb55387"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1208"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2016/11/04/jasper-use-of-uninitialized-value-in-jpc_pi_nextcprl-jpc_t2cod-c"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2020.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3827"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97584"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…