GHSA-4FRH-9V5H-WQJ6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-27 06:31 – Updated: 2026-08-27 06:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
eth: bnxt: avoid deadlock when canceling IRQ affinity notifier
Unregistering IRQ affinity notifiers waits for the callback synchronously. bnxt takes the netdev instance lock in the notifier (to restart the queue) and cancels the work under the same lock. This may obviously deadlock.
Move the restart to the async service task. The queue restart isn't super time sensitive. Store the new TPH tag, schedule the task. Safely canceling the service task is already ironed out.
In bnxt_request_irq() the order of registering notifier, affinity and initial TPH programming has to be inverted. I think it was racy previously since user may trigger an update as soon as notifier is installed.
There's a small known gap - if pcie_tph_get_cpu_st() fails at init and the target tag is 0 we may miss programming the entry. This does not seem worth fixing, the code has skip-on-failure all over the place, anyway.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-74745"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-08-26T15:16:53Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\neth: bnxt: avoid deadlock when canceling IRQ affinity notifier\n\nUnregistering IRQ affinity notifiers waits for the callback synchronously.\nbnxt takes the netdev instance lock in the notifier (to restart the queue)\nand cancels the work under the same lock. This may obviously deadlock.\n\nMove the restart to the async service task. The queue restart isn\u0027t\nsuper time sensitive. Store the new TPH tag, schedule the task.\nSafely canceling the service task is already ironed out.\n\nIn bnxt_request_irq() the order of registering notifier, affinity and\ninitial TPH programming has to be inverted. I think it was racy\npreviously since user may trigger an update as soon as notifier\nis installed.\n\nThere\u0027s a small known gap - if pcie_tph_get_cpu_st() fails at init\nand the target tag is 0 we may miss programming the entry.\nThis does not seem worth fixing, the code has skip-on-failure\nall over the place, anyway.",
"id": "GHSA-4frh-9v5h-wqj6",
"modified": "2026-08-27T06:31:30Z",
"published": "2026-08-27T06:31:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-74745"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/51e96fa31f7e7eac2cba8f854e24d36600cc040b"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8b1118fc5a5d2cdc21cc07b5106921ad4f77c544"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.