GHSA-4GVM-4MW2-9FPV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 03:17 – Updated: 2022-05-02 03:17
VLAI?
Details
ext/openssl/ossl_ocsp.c in Ruby 1.8 and 1.9 does not properly check the return value from the OCSP_basic_verify function, which might allow remote attackers to successfully present an invalid X.509 certificate, possibly involving a revoked certificate.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2009-0642"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-287"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2009-02-20T06:47:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "ext/openssl/ossl_ocsp.c in Ruby 1.8 and 1.9 does not properly check the return value from the OCSP_basic_verify function, which might allow remote attackers to successfully present an invalid X.509 certificate, possibly involving a revoked certificate.",
"id": "GHSA-4gvm-4mw2-9fpv",
"modified": "2022-05-02T03:17:07Z",
"published": "2022-05-02T03:17:07Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-0642"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/48761"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A11450"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=513528"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/1091"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/33750"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/35699"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/35937"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2009:193"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2009-1140.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/33769"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1022505"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-805-1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…