ghsa-4gvm-4mw2-9fpv
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-02 03:17
Modified
2022-05-02 03:17
Details
ext/openssl/ossl_ocsp.c in Ruby 1.8 and 1.9 does not properly check the return value from the OCSP_basic_verify function, which might allow remote attackers to successfully present an invalid X.509 certificate, possibly involving a revoked certificate.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2009-0642" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-287" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2009-02-20T06:47:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "ext/openssl/ossl_ocsp.c in Ruby 1.8 and 1.9 does not properly check the return value from the OCSP_basic_verify function, which might allow remote attackers to successfully present an invalid X.509 certificate, possibly involving a revoked certificate.", "id": "GHSA-4gvm-4mw2-9fpv", "modified": "2022-05-02T03:17:07Z", "published": "2022-05-02T03:17:07Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-0642" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/48761" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A11450" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=513528" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/1091" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/33750" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/35699" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/35937" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2009:193" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2009-1140.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/33769" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1022505" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-805-1" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.