ghsa-4hmc-wjwv-5gj5
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 01:36
Modified
2022-05-17 01:36
Details
The Portable Tool Library (aka PTLib) before 2.10.10, as used in Ekiga before 4.0.1, does not properly detect recursion during entity expansion, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory and CPU consumption) via a crafted PXML document containing a large number of nested entity references, aka a "billion laughs attack."
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2013-1864" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2014-05-23T14:55:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The Portable Tool Library (aka PTLib) before 2.10.10, as used in Ekiga before 4.0.1, does not properly detect recursion during entity expansion, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory and CPU consumption) via a crafted PXML document containing a large number of nested entity references, aka a \"billion laughs attack.\"", "id": "GHSA-4hmc-wjwv-5gj5", "modified": "2022-05-17T01:36:25Z", "published": "2022-05-17T01:36:25Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-1864" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/82885" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2014/suse-su-20140237-1.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-March/099553.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://osvdb.org/91439" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2013/q1/674" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/52659" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://sourceforge.net/p/opalvoip/code/28856" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ekiga.org/news/2013-02-21/ekiga-4.0.1-stable-available" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/58520" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.