GHSA-4HWJ-3PPP-CX8V

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-16 15:34 – Updated: 2025-04-29 21:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

exfat: fix random stack corruption after get_block

When get_block is called with a buffer_head allocated on the stack, such as do_mpage_readpage, stack corruption due to buffer_head UAF may occur in the following race condition situation.

 <CPU 0>                      <CPU 1>

mpage_read_folio <> do_mpage_readpage exfat_get_block bh_read __bh_read get_bh(bh) submit_bh wait_on_buffer ... end_buffer_read_sync __end_buffer_read_notouch unlock_buffer <> ... ... ... ... <> . . another_function <> put_bh(bh) atomic_dec(bh->b_count) * stack corruption here *

This patch returns -EAGAIN if a folio does not have buffers when bh_read needs to be called. By doing this, the caller can fallback to functions like block_read_full_folio(), create a buffer_head in the folio, and then call get_block again.

Let's do not call bh_read() with on-stack buffer_head.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-22036"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-362",
      "CWE-416"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-04-16T15:15:56Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nexfat: fix random stack corruption after get_block\n\nWhen get_block is called with a buffer_head allocated on the stack, such\nas do_mpage_readpage, stack corruption due to buffer_head UAF may occur in\nthe following race condition situation.\n\n     \u003cCPU 0\u003e                      \u003cCPU 1\u003e\nmpage_read_folio\n  \u003c\u003cbh on stack\u003e\u003e\n  do_mpage_readpage\n    exfat_get_block\n      bh_read\n        __bh_read\n\t  get_bh(bh)\n          submit_bh\n          wait_on_buffer\n                              ...\n                              end_buffer_read_sync\n                                __end_buffer_read_notouch\n                                   unlock_buffer\n          \u003c\u003ckeep going\u003e\u003e\n        ...\n      ...\n    ...\n  ...\n\u003c\u003cbh is not valid out of mpage_read_folio\u003e\u003e\n   .\n   .\nanother_function\n  \u003c\u003cvariable A on stack\u003e\u003e\n                                   put_bh(bh)\n                                     atomic_dec(bh-\u003eb_count)\n  * stack corruption here *\n\nThis patch returns -EAGAIN if a folio does not have buffers when bh_read\nneeds to be called. By doing this, the caller can fallback to functions\nlike block_read_full_folio(), create a buffer_head in the folio, and then\ncall get_block again.\n\nLet\u0027s do not call bh_read() with on-stack buffer_head.",
  "id": "GHSA-4hwj-3ppp-cx8v",
  "modified": "2025-04-29T21:31:47Z",
  "published": "2025-04-16T15:34:40Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22036"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1bb7ff4204b6d4927e982cd256286c09ed4fd8ca"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/49b0a6ab8e528a0c1c50e37cef9b9c7c121365f2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f7447286363dc1e410bf30b87d75168f3519f9cc"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f807a6bf2005740fa26b4f59c4a003dc966b9afd"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…