ghsa-4j4j-2jh5-2x9j
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-29 02:59
Modified
2022-04-29 02:59
Details

Heap-based buffer overflow in winhlp32.exe in Windows NT, Windows 2000 through SP4, Windows XP through SP2, and Windows 2003 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted .hlp file.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2004-1306"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2004-12-31T05:00:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in winhlp32.exe in Windows NT, Windows 2000 through SP4, Windows XP through SP2, and Windows 2003 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted .hlp file.",
  "id": "GHSA-4j4j-2jh5-2x9j",
  "modified": "2022-04-29T02:59:19Z",
  "published": "2022-04-29T02:59:18Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2004-1306"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/18678"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=110383690219440\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/12092"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.xfocus.net/flashsky/icoExp"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.