ghsa-4mjh-684p-r652
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 02:39
Modified
2022-05-17 02:39
Details
Heap-based buffer overflow in the readgifimage function in the gif2tiff tool in libtiff 4.0.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted height and width values in a GIF image.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2013-4243" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2013-09-10T19:55:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in the readgifimage function in the gif2tiff tool in libtiff 4.0.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted height and width values in a GIF image.", "id": "GHSA-4mjh-684p-r652", "modified": "2022-05-17T02:39:18Z", "published": "2022-05-17T02:39:18Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-4243" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014:0222" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014:0223" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2013-4243" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996052" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201701-16" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2451" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0223.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/54543" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/54628" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2013/dsa-2744" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/62082" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.