ghsa-4mm4-rvx3-h58h
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-09-27 15:30
Modified
2024-10-17 15:31
Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mptcp: pm: Fix uaf in __timer_delete_sync
There are two paths to access mptcp_pm_del_add_timer, result in a race condition:
CPU1 CPU2
==== ====
net_rx_action
napi_poll netlink_sendmsg
__napi_poll netlink_unicast
process_backlog netlink_unicast_kernel
__netif_receive_skb genl_rcv
__netif_receive_skb_one_core netlink_rcv_skb
NF_HOOK genl_rcv_msg
ip_local_deliver_finish genl_family_rcv_msg
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu genl_family_rcv_msg_doit
tcp_v4_rcv mptcp_pm_nl_flush_addrs_doit
tcp_v4_do_rcv mptcp_nl_remove_addrs_list
tcp_rcv_established mptcp_pm_remove_addrs_and_subflows
tcp_data_queue remove_anno_list_by_saddr
mptcp_incoming_options mptcp_pm_del_add_timer
mptcp_pm_del_add_timer kfree(entry)
In remove_anno_list_by_saddr(running on CPU2), after leaving the critical zone protected by "pm.lock", the entry will be released, which leads to the occurrence of uaf in the mptcp_pm_del_add_timer(running on CPU1).
Keeping a reference to add_timer inside the lock, and calling sk_stop_timer_sync() with this reference, instead of "entry->add_timer".
Move list_del(&entry->list) to mptcp_pm_del_add_timer and inside the pm lock, do not directly access any members of the entry outside the pm lock, which can avoid similar "entry->x" uaf.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2024-46858" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-416" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2024-09-27T13:15:17Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmptcp: pm: Fix uaf in __timer_delete_sync\n\nThere are two paths to access mptcp_pm_del_add_timer, result in a race\ncondition:\n\n CPU1\t\t\t\tCPU2\n ==== ====\n net_rx_action\n napi_poll netlink_sendmsg\n __napi_poll netlink_unicast\n process_backlog netlink_unicast_kernel\n __netif_receive_skb genl_rcv\n __netif_receive_skb_one_core netlink_rcv_skb\n NF_HOOK genl_rcv_msg\n ip_local_deliver_finish genl_family_rcv_msg\n ip_protocol_deliver_rcu genl_family_rcv_msg_doit\n tcp_v4_rcv mptcp_pm_nl_flush_addrs_doit\n tcp_v4_do_rcv mptcp_nl_remove_addrs_list\n tcp_rcv_established mptcp_pm_remove_addrs_and_subflows\n tcp_data_queue remove_anno_list_by_saddr\n mptcp_incoming_options mptcp_pm_del_add_timer\n mptcp_pm_del_add_timer kfree(entry)\n\nIn remove_anno_list_by_saddr(running on CPU2), after leaving the critical\nzone protected by \"pm.lock\", the entry will be released, which leads to the\noccurrence of uaf in the mptcp_pm_del_add_timer(running on CPU1).\n\nKeeping a reference to add_timer inside the lock, and calling\nsk_stop_timer_sync() with this reference, instead of \"entry-\u003eadd_timer\".\n\nMove list_del(\u0026entry-\u003elist) to mptcp_pm_del_add_timer and inside the pm lock,\ndo not directly access any members of the entry outside the pm lock, which\ncan avoid similar \"entry-\u003ex\" uaf.", "id": "GHSA-4mm4-rvx3-h58h", "modified": "2024-10-17T15:31:08Z", "published": "2024-09-27T15:30:34Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46858" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0e7814b028cd50b3ff79659d23dfa9da6a1e75e1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/12134a652b0a10064844ea235173e70246eba6dc" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3554482f4691571fc4b5490c17ae26896e62171c" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6452b162549c7f9ef54655d3fb9977b9192e6e5b" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/67409b358500c71632116356a0b065f112d7b707" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b4cd80b0338945a94972ac3ed54f8338d2da2076" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.