GHSA-4PG5-RFFM-VPMP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 04:01 – Updated: 2025-04-12 12:50
VLAI?
Details
GE Healthcare Discovery 530C has a password of #bigguy1 for the (1) acqservice user and (2) wsservice user of the Xeleris System, which has unspecified impact and attack vectors. NOTE: it is not clear whether this password is default, hardcoded, or dependent on another system or product that requires a fixed value.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2009-5143"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2015-08-04T14:59:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "GE Healthcare Discovery 530C has a password of #bigguy1 for the (1) acqservice user and (2) wsservice user of the Xeleris System, which has unspecified impact and attack vectors. NOTE: it is not clear whether this password is default, hardcoded, or dependent on another system or product that requires a fixed value.",
"id": "GHSA-4pg5-rffm-vpmp",
"modified": "2025-04-12T12:50:29Z",
"published": "2022-05-02T04:01:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-5143"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSMA-18-037-02"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://twitter.com/digitalbond/status/619250429751222277"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://apps.gehealthcare.com/servlet/ClientServlet/5323167-1EN_r2.pdf?REQ=RAA\u0026DIRECTION=5323167-1EN\u0026FILENAME=5323167-1EN_r2.pdf\u0026FILEREV=2\u0026DOCREV_ORG=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2015/07/10/vulnerable-breasts"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…