GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-4PQW-3H25-QRQ3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-25 09:31 – Updated: 2026-09-09 15:34
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

zram: fix use-after-free in zram_bvec_write_partial()

zram_read_page() picks the sync or async backing device read path based on whether the parent bio is NULL. zram_bvec_write_partial() passes its parent bio down, so for ZRAM_WB slots the read is dispatched asynchronously and zram_read_page() returns 0 while the bio is still in flight. The caller then runs memcpy_from_bvec(), zram_write_page() and __free_page() on the buffer, leaving the async read to write into a freed page.

zram_bvec_read_partial() was switched to NULL in commit 4e3c87b9421d ("zram: fix synchronous reads") for the same reason; the write_partial counterpart was missed.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-53185"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-364",
      "CWE-416"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-25T09:16:35Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nzram: fix use-after-free in zram_bvec_write_partial()\n\nzram_read_page() picks the sync or async backing device read path based on\nwhether the parent bio is NULL.  zram_bvec_write_partial() passes its\nparent bio down, so for ZRAM_WB slots the read is dispatched\nasynchronously and zram_read_page() returns 0 while the bio is still in\nflight.  The caller then runs memcpy_from_bvec(), zram_write_page() and\n__free_page() on the buffer, leaving the async read to write into a freed\npage.\n\nzram_bvec_read_partial() was switched to NULL in commit 4e3c87b9421d\n(\"zram: fix synchronous reads\") for the same reason; the write_partial\ncounterpart was missed.",
  "id": "GHSA-4pqw-3h25-qrq3",
  "modified": "2026-09-09T15:34:36Z",
  "published": "2026-06-25T09:31:20Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53185"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:59723"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:61887"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:63013"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:63014"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:65708"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53185"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2492735"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0c2821665ff71be3f4b07ecece384669f2877f6a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/198b5a14cca27263b9c14b20114c8092de15dfcb"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/732fd9f0b9c1cdc6dfd77162ded60df005182cc0"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/77a602b505ce4802915853cfc435a4722fab3e64"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c96786d6ff1acc1d54d9241e97767554c1dfdd5b"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-53185.json"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…