ghsa-4qfr-3jpc-g89j
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 03:13
Modified
2022-05-17 03:13
Details
Multiple buffer overflows in libtiff before 4.0.3 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds write) via a crafted (1) extension block in a GIF image or (2) GIF raster image to tools/gif2tiff.c or (3) a long filename for a TIFF image to tools/rgb2ycbcr.c. NOTE: vectors 1 and 3 are disputed by Red Hat, which states that the input cannot exceed the allocated buffer size.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2013-4231" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2014-01-19T17:16:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Multiple buffer overflows in libtiff before 4.0.3 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds write) via a crafted (1) extension block in a GIF image or (2) GIF raster image to tools/gif2tiff.c or (3) a long filename for a TIFF image to tools/rgb2ycbcr.c. NOTE: vectors 1 and 3 are disputed by Red Hat, which states that the input cannot exceed the allocated buffer size.", "id": "GHSA-4qfr-3jpc-g89j", "modified": "2022-05-17T03:13:10Z", "published": "2022-05-17T03:13:10Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-4231" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995965" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2450" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0223.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/54543" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/54628" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.asmail.be/msg0055359936.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2013/dsa-2744" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/08/10/2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/61695" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.