ghsa-4qm7-rm85-wr68
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 03:07
Modified
2022-05-14 03:07
Details

The server implementation of the EAP-MSCHAPv2 protocol in the eap-mschapv2 plugin in strongSwan 4.2.12 through 5.x before 5.3.4 does not properly validate local state, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via an empty Success message in response to an initial Challenge message.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2015-8023"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2015-11-18T16:59:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The server implementation of the EAP-MSCHAPv2 protocol in the eap-mschapv2 plugin in strongSwan 4.2.12 through 5.x before 5.3.4 does not properly validate local state, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via an empty Success message in response to an initial Challenge message.",
  "id": "GHSA-4qm7-rm85-wr68",
  "modified": "2022-05-14T03:07:25Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T03:07:25Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-8023"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.strongswan.org/blog/2015/11/16/strongswan-vulnerability-(cve-2015-8023).html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-12/msg00025.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-11/msg00139.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3398"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/84947"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2811-1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.