ghsa-4r2q-mgcp-7w6w
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 05:01
Modified
2022-05-17 05:01
Details
Xen 4.0 and 4.1 allows local HVM guest OS kernels to cause a denial of service (domain 0 VCPU hang and kernel panic) by modifying the physical address space in a way that triggers excessive shared page search time during the p2m teardown.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2012-3433" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2012-11-24T20:55:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Xen 4.0 and 4.1 allows local HVM guest OS kernels to cause a denial of service (domain 0 VCPU hang and kernel panic) by modifying the physical address space in a way that triggers excessive shared page search time during the p2m teardown.", "id": "GHSA-4r2q-mgcp-7w6w", "modified": "2022-05-17T05:01:51Z", "published": "2022-05-17T05:01:51Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-3433" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-08/msg00024.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-08/msg00025.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-09/msg00017.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-09/msg00018.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2012-08/msg00855.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/55082" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201309-24.xml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2531" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/08/09/3" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/54942" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.