GHSA-4RMP-XHJH-JRFR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:28 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:28
VLAI?
Details
Integer overflow in the getword function in options.c in pppd in Paul's PPP Package (ppp) before 2.4.7 allows attackers to "access privileged options" via a long word in an options file, which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow that "[corrupts] security-relevant variables."
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-3158"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2014-11-15T21:59:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Integer overflow in the getword function in options.c in pppd in Paul\u0027s PPP Package (ppp) before 2.4.7 allows attackers to \"access privileged options\" via a long word in an options file, which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow that \"[corrupts] security-relevant variables.\"",
"id": "GHSA-4rmp-xhjh-jrfr",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:28:14Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:28:14Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-3158"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/paulusmack/ppp/commit/7658e8257183f062dc01f87969c140707c7e52cb"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128748"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2014-0368.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2014-August/136932.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=linux-ppp\u0026m=140764978420764"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2014/dsa-3079"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2015:135"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinapr2015-2511959.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2429-1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…