GHSA-529Q-RV2G-9C8J

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-30 18:18 – Updated: 2022-04-30 18:18
VLAI?
Details

Lotus Domino server 5.0.8 with NoBanner enabled allows remote attackers to (1) determine the physical path of the server via a request for a nonexistent file with a .pl (Perl) extension, which leaks the pathname in the error message, or (2) make any request that causes an HTTP 500 error, which leaks the server's version name in the HTTP error message.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2002-0245"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2002-05-29T04:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Lotus Domino server 5.0.8 with NoBanner enabled allows remote attackers to (1) determine the physical path of the server via a request for a nonexistent file with a .pl (Perl) extension, which leaks the pathname in the error message, or (2) make any request that causes an HTTP 500 error, which leaks the server\u0027s version name in the HTTP error message.",
  "id": "GHSA-529q-rv2g-9c8j",
  "modified": "2022-04-30T18:18:50Z",
  "published": "2022-04-30T18:18:50Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2002-0245"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=101310812804716\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www-1.ibm.com/support/manager.wss?rs=1\u0026rt=0\u0026org=sims\u0026doc=07B32060E4CC97E985256B64005AEB0F"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/8160.php"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/4049"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…