ghsa-52qf-gwh3-p975
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 03:58
Modified
2022-05-14 03:58
Details
PCRE before 8.38 mishandles the /(?J)(?'d'(?'d'\g{d}))/ pattern and related patterns with certain recursive back references, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (buffer overflow) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted regular expression, as demonstrated by a JavaScript RegExp object encountered by Konqueror, a related issue to CVE-2015-8392 and CVE-2015-8395.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2015-8384" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2015-12-02T01:59:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "PCRE before 8.38 mishandles the /(?J)(?\u0027d\u0027(?\u0027d\u0027\\g{d}))/ pattern and related patterns with certain recursive back references, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (buffer overflow) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted regular expression, as demonstrated by a JavaScript RegExp object encountered by Konqueror, a related issue to CVE-2015-8392 and CVE-2015-8395.", "id": "GHSA-52qf-gwh3-p975", "modified": "2022-05-14T03:58:26Z", "published": "2022-05-14T03:58:26Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-8384" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:1132" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa128" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201607-02" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2750.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://vcs.pcre.org/pcre/code/trunk/ChangeLog?view=markup" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/11/29/1" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.