GHSA-52XQ-4J7G-G3FJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-14 15:33 – Updated: 2026-01-19 15:30In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
smc91x: fix broken irq-context in PREEMPT_RT
When smc91x.c is built with PREEMPT_RT, the following splat occurs in FVP_RevC:
[ 13.055000] smc91x LNRO0003:00 eth0: link up, 10Mbps, half-duplex, lpa 0x0000 [ 13.062137] BUG: workqueue leaked atomic, lock or RCU: kworker/2:1[106] [ 13.062137] preempt=0x00000000 lock=0->0 RCU=0->1 workfn=mld_ifc_work [ 13.062266] C ** replaying previous printk message ** [ 13.062266] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 106 Comm: kworker/2:1 Not tainted 6.18.0-dirty #179 PREEMPT_{RT,(full)} [ 13.062353] Hardware name: , BIOS [ 13.062382] Workqueue: mld mld_ifc_work [ 13.062469] Call trace: [ 13.062494] show_stack+0x24/0x40 (C) [ 13.062602] __dump_stack+0x28/0x48 [ 13.062710] dump_stack_lvl+0x7c/0xb0 [ 13.062818] dump_stack+0x18/0x34 [ 13.062926] process_scheduled_works+0x294/0x450 [ 13.063043] worker_thread+0x260/0x3d8 [ 13.063124] kthread+0x1c4/0x228 [ 13.063235] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
This happens because smc_special_trylock() disables IRQs even on PREEMPT_RT, but smc_special_unlock() does not restore IRQs on PREEMPT_RT. The reason is that smc_special_unlock() calls spin_unlock_irqrestore(), and rcu_read_unlock_bh() in __dev_queue_xmit() cannot invoke rcu_read_unlock() through __local_bh_enable_ip() when current->softirq_disable_cnt becomes zero.
To address this issue, replace smc_special_trylock() with spin_trylock_irqsave().
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-71132"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-01-14T15:16:02Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsmc91x: fix broken irq-context in PREEMPT_RT\n\nWhen smc91x.c is built with PREEMPT_RT, the following splat occurs\nin FVP_RevC:\n\n[ 13.055000] smc91x LNRO0003:00 eth0: link up, 10Mbps, half-duplex, lpa 0x0000\n[ 13.062137] BUG: workqueue leaked atomic, lock or RCU: kworker/2:1[106]\n[ 13.062137] preempt=0x00000000 lock=0-\u003e0 RCU=0-\u003e1 workfn=mld_ifc_work\n[ 13.062266] C\n** replaying previous printk message **\n[ 13.062266] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 106 Comm: kworker/2:1 Not tainted 6.18.0-dirty #179 PREEMPT_{RT,(full)}\n[ 13.062353] Hardware name: , BIOS\n[ 13.062382] Workqueue: mld mld_ifc_work\n[ 13.062469] Call trace:\n[ 13.062494] show_stack+0x24/0x40 (C)\n[ 13.062602] __dump_stack+0x28/0x48\n[ 13.062710] dump_stack_lvl+0x7c/0xb0\n[ 13.062818] dump_stack+0x18/0x34\n[ 13.062926] process_scheduled_works+0x294/0x450\n[ 13.063043] worker_thread+0x260/0x3d8\n[ 13.063124] kthread+0x1c4/0x228\n[ 13.063235] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20\n\nThis happens because smc_special_trylock() disables IRQs even on PREEMPT_RT,\nbut smc_special_unlock() does not restore IRQs on PREEMPT_RT.\nThe reason is that smc_special_unlock() calls spin_unlock_irqrestore(),\nand rcu_read_unlock_bh() in __dev_queue_xmit() cannot invoke\nrcu_read_unlock() through __local_bh_enable_ip() when current-\u003esoftirq_disable_cnt becomes zero.\n\nTo address this issue, replace smc_special_trylock() with spin_trylock_irqsave().",
"id": "GHSA-52xq-4j7g-g3fj",
"modified": "2026-01-19T15:30:36Z",
"published": "2026-01-14T15:33:02Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-71132"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1c4cb705e733250d13243f6a69b8b5a92e39b9f6"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/36561b86cb2501647662cfaf91286dd6973804a6"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6402078bd9d1ed46e79465e1faaa42e3458f8a33"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9d222141b00156509d67d80c771fbefa92c43ace"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b6018d5c1a8f09d5efe4d6961d7ee45fdf3a7ce3"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ef277ae121b3249c99994652210a326b52d527b0"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.