ghsa-5383-rqrv-fg4g
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 05:27
Modified
2022-05-17 05:27
Details
The virSecurityManagerGetPrivateData function in security/security_manager.c in libvirt 0.8.8 through 0.9.1 uses the wrong argument for a sizeof call, which causes incorrect processing of "security manager private data" that "reopens disk probing" and might allow guest OS users to read arbitrary files on the host OS. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of a CVE-2010-2238 regression.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2011-2178" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2011-08-10T20:55:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The virSecurityManagerGetPrivateData function in security/security_manager.c in libvirt 0.8.8 through 0.9.1 uses the wrong argument for a sizeof call, which causes incorrect processing of \"security manager private data\" that \"reopens disk probing\" and might allow guest OS users to read arbitrary files on the host OS. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of a CVE-2010-2238 regression.", "id": "GHSA-5383-rqrv-fg4g", "modified": "2022-05-17T05:27:12Z", "published": "2022-05-17T05:27:12Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-2178" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709769" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709775" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2011-May/msg01935.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://libvirt.org/news.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-July/062515.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2011-06/msg00030.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/2011/CVE-2011-2178.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1152-1" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.