GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-543C-R37X-R759

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-11 21:31 – Updated: 2026-09-14 15:32
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

power: supply: cros_usbpd-charger: bound the EC-reported port count

cros_usbpd_charger_probe() reads two port counts from the EC and uses one of them, num_charger_ports, as the loop bound when populating a fixed-size array:

struct port_data *ports[EC_USB_PD_MAX_PORTS];   /* 8 entries */
...
for (i = 0; i < charger->num_charger_ports; i++)
    charger->ports[charger->num_registered_psy++] = port;

Both num_usbpd_ports (from EC_CMD_USB_PD_PORTS) and num_charger_ports (from EC_CMD_CHARGE_PORT_COUNT) are u8 values reported by the EC. The only validation is a sanity check that compares the two EC-reported values against each other:

if (num_charger_ports < num_usbpd_ports ||
    num_charger_ports > num_usbpd_ports + 1)
    return -EPROTO;

It never checks either count against EC_USB_PD_MAX_PORTS, the size of the ports[] array. A malfunctioning, malicious or compromised EC that reports num_usbpd_ports == num_charger_ports == N for any N > 8 (for example both 255) passes this check, and the loop then writes N pointers into the 8-entry ports[] array embedded in the devm_kzalloc()'d charger_data, overflowing it by up to 255 - 8 = 247 entries (~1976 bytes): a slab out-of-bounds write.

Reject a port count larger than the ports[] array can hold.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-89471"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-11T20:19:28Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\npower: supply: cros_usbpd-charger: bound the EC-reported port count\n\ncros_usbpd_charger_probe() reads two port counts from the EC and uses\none of them, num_charger_ports, as the loop bound when populating a\nfixed-size array:\n\n\tstruct port_data *ports[EC_USB_PD_MAX_PORTS];\t/* 8 entries */\n\t...\n\tfor (i = 0; i \u003c charger-\u003enum_charger_ports; i++)\n\t\tcharger-\u003eports[charger-\u003enum_registered_psy++] = port;\n\nBoth num_usbpd_ports (from EC_CMD_USB_PD_PORTS) and num_charger_ports\n(from EC_CMD_CHARGE_PORT_COUNT) are u8 values reported by the EC. The\nonly validation is a sanity check that compares the two EC-reported\nvalues against each other:\n\n\tif (num_charger_ports \u003c num_usbpd_ports ||\n\t    num_charger_ports \u003e num_usbpd_ports + 1)\n\t\treturn -EPROTO;\n\nIt never checks either count against EC_USB_PD_MAX_PORTS, the size of\nthe ports[] array. A malfunctioning, malicious or compromised EC that\nreports num_usbpd_ports == num_charger_ports == N for any N \u003e 8 (for\nexample both 255) passes this check, and the loop then writes N pointers\ninto the 8-entry ports[] array embedded in the devm_kzalloc()\u0027d\ncharger_data, overflowing it by up to 255 - 8 = 247 entries (~1976\nbytes): a slab out-of-bounds write.\n\nReject a port count larger than the ports[] array can hold.",
  "id": "GHSA-543c-r37x-r759",
  "modified": "2026-09-14T15:32:25Z",
  "published": "2026-09-11T21:31:27Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-89471"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0b5096f6804161b61451b1cec0e38678630be849"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2746d502b12b343384fb747bdef9cbcfbd7444a2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3d1e01443b221081258ff34ea0cdd0431e4ff62e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/48355ce49359740f52e94d3623f6fc557ce341f0"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/78be8b7403ff7638162438b664a07d19da76059e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a1905375dfc0b9612bbee52fc066e3a70c0d671d"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c46c9f447415ca802afab51dea1eafc08ddff1c6"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fd29d08ee487f3bf50f2575aaa74f78a74b09b21"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…