GHSA-54J7-PX5Q-9WRR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-01 15:31 – Updated: 2025-11-07 21:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

arm64/mm: fix incorrect file_map_count for non-leaf pmd/pud

The page table check trigger BUG_ON() unexpectedly when collapse hugepage:

------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at mm/page_table_check.c:82! Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP Dumping ftrace buffer: (ftrace buffer empty) Modules linked in: CPU: 6 PID: 68 Comm: khugepaged Not tainted 6.1.0-rc3+ #750 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : page_table_check_clear.isra.0+0x258/0x3f0 lr : page_table_check_clear.isra.0+0x240/0x3f0 [...] Call trace: page_table_check_clear.isra.0+0x258/0x3f0 __page_table_check_pmd_clear+0xbc/0x108 pmdp_collapse_flush+0xb0/0x160 collapse_huge_page+0xa08/0x1080 hpage_collapse_scan_pmd+0xf30/0x1590 khugepaged_scan_mm_slot.constprop.0+0x52c/0xac8 khugepaged+0x338/0x518 kthread+0x278/0x2f8 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 [...]

Since pmd_user_accessible_page() doesn't check if a pmd is leaf, it decrease file_map_count for a non-leaf pmd comes from collapse_huge_page(). and so trigger BUG_ON() unexpectedly.

Fix this problem by using pmd_leaf() insteal of pmd_present() in pmd_user_accessible_page(). Moreover, use pud_leaf() for pud_user_accessible_page() too.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-49778"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-617"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-05-01T15:16:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\narm64/mm: fix incorrect file_map_count for non-leaf pmd/pud\n\nThe page table check trigger BUG_ON() unexpectedly when collapse hugepage:\n\n ------------[ cut here ]------------\n kernel BUG at mm/page_table_check.c:82!\n Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP\n Dumping ftrace buffer:\n    (ftrace buffer empty)\n Modules linked in:\n CPU: 6 PID: 68 Comm: khugepaged Not tainted 6.1.0-rc3+ #750\n Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)\n pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)\n pc : page_table_check_clear.isra.0+0x258/0x3f0\n lr : page_table_check_clear.isra.0+0x240/0x3f0\n[...]\n Call trace:\n  page_table_check_clear.isra.0+0x258/0x3f0\n  __page_table_check_pmd_clear+0xbc/0x108\n  pmdp_collapse_flush+0xb0/0x160\n  collapse_huge_page+0xa08/0x1080\n  hpage_collapse_scan_pmd+0xf30/0x1590\n  khugepaged_scan_mm_slot.constprop.0+0x52c/0xac8\n  khugepaged+0x338/0x518\n  kthread+0x278/0x2f8\n  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20\n[...]\n\nSince pmd_user_accessible_page() doesn\u0027t check if a pmd is leaf, it\ndecrease file_map_count for a non-leaf pmd comes from collapse_huge_page().\nand so trigger BUG_ON() unexpectedly.\n\nFix this problem by using pmd_leaf() insteal of pmd_present() in\npmd_user_accessible_page(). Moreover, use pud_leaf() for\npud_user_accessible_page() too.",
  "id": "GHSA-54j7-px5q-9wrr",
  "modified": "2025-11-07T21:31:16Z",
  "published": "2025-05-01T15:31:46Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-49778"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2d458046df634088611d44fd77f45465e833ef78"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5b47348fc0b18a78c96f8474cc90b7525ad1bbfe"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…