ghsa-56w6-634g-9pc2
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 01:47
Modified
2022-05-01 01:47
Details

Linux kernel 2.4.x and 2.6.x allows local users to cause a denial of service (CPU and memory consumption) and bypass RLIM_MEMLOCK limits via the mlockall call.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2005-0179"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2005-03-07T05:00:00Z",
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "Linux kernel 2.4.x and 2.6.x allows local users to cause a denial of service (CPU and memory consumption) and bypass RLIM_MEMLOCK limits via the mlockall call.",
  "id": "GHSA-56w6-634g-9pc2",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T01:47:37Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T01:47:37Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-0179"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A9890"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://distro.conectiva.com.br/atualizacoes/index.php?id=a\u0026anuncio=000930"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2005-January/030660.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/17002"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-092.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-663.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2005/1878"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.