GHSA-57J8-FW4M-QRRV

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 02:31 – Updated: 2022-05-01 02:31
VLAI?
Details

Kolab Server 2.0.0 and 2.0.1 does not properly handle when a large email is sent with a "." in the wrong place, which causes kolabfilter to add another ".", which might break clear-text signatures and attachments. NOTE: it is not clear whether this issue crosses privilege boundaries, so this might not be a vulnerability.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2005-4828"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2005-12-31T05:00:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Kolab Server 2.0.0 and 2.0.1 does not properly handle when a large email is sent with a \".\" in the wrong place, which causes kolabfilter to add another \".\", which might break clear-text signatures and attachments.  NOTE: it is not clear whether this issue crosses privilege boundaries, so this might not be a vulnerability.",
  "id": "GHSA-57j8-fw4m-qrrv",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T02:31:08Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T02:31:08Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-4828"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://kolab.org/security/kolab-vendor-notice-07.txt"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2006:013"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/22538"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…