ghsa-586h-8q3m-f5hh
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 02:51
Modified
2022-05-14 02:51
Severity ?
Details
D-Link DNS-320L firmware before 1.04b12, DNS-327L before 1.03b04 Build0119, DNR-326 1.40b03, DNS-320B 1.02b01, DNS-345 1.03b06, DNS-325 1.05b03, and DNS-322L 2.00b07 allow remote attackers to bypass authentication and log in with administrator permissions by passing the cgi_set_wto command in the cmd parameter, and setting the spawned session's cookie to username=admin.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2014-7857" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-287" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2017-08-25T18:29:00Z", "severity": "CRITICAL" }, "details": "D-Link DNS-320L firmware before 1.04b12, DNS-327L before 1.03b04 Build0119, DNR-326 1.40b03, DNS-320B 1.02b01, DNS-345 1.03b06, DNS-325 1.05b03, and DNS-322L 2.00b07 allow remote attackers to bypass authentication and log in with administrator permissions by passing the cgi_set_wto command in the cmd parameter, and setting the spawned session\u0027s cookie to username=admin.", "id": "GHSA-586h-8q3m-f5hh", "modified": "2022-05-14T02:51:00Z", "published": "2022-05-14T02:51:00Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-7857" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/132075/D-Link-Bypass-Buffer-Overflow.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2015/May/125" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.search-lab.hu/media/D-Link_Security_advisory_3_0_public.pdf" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/535626/100/200/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/74880" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.