GHSA-5G8P-QPCJ-85W5
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 04:52 – Updated: 2022-05-17 04:52
VLAI?
Details
The TLS and DTLS implementations in wolfSSL CyaSSL before 2.5.0 do not properly consider timing side-channel attacks on a noncompliant MAC check operation during the processing of malformed CBC padding, which allows remote attackers to conduct distinguishing attacks and plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data for crafted packets, a related issue to CVE-2013-0169.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2013-1623"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2013-02-08T19:55:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The TLS and DTLS implementations in wolfSSL CyaSSL before 2.5.0 do not properly consider timing side-channel attacks on a noncompliant MAC check operation during the processing of malformed CBC padding, which allows remote attackers to conduct distinguishing attacks and plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data for crafted packets, a related issue to CVE-2013-0169.",
"id": "GHSA-5g8p-qpcj-85w5",
"modified": "2022-05-17T04:52:26Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T04:52:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-1623"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/02/05/24"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/53372"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201308-06.xml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.isg.rhul.ac.uk/tls/TLStiming.pdf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.yassl.com/yaSSL/Blog/Entries/2013/2/5_WolfSSL%2C_provider_of_CyaSSL_Embedded_SSL%2C_releases_first_embedded_TLS_and_DTLS_protocol_fix_for_Lucky_Thirteen_Attack.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…