ghsa-5hfx-qqxc-xf62
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 18:01
Modified
2022-05-01 18:01
Details
Object linking and embedding (OLE) Automation, as used in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2, Server 2003 SP1 and SP2, Office 2004 for Mac, and Visual Basic 6.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via the substringData method on a TextNode object, which causes an integer overflow that leads to a buffer overflow.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2007-2224" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2007-08-14T21:17:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Object linking and embedding (OLE) Automation, as used in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2, Server 2003 SP1 and SP2, Office 2004 for Mac, and Visual Basic 6.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via the substringData method on a TextNode object, which causes an integer overflow that leads to a buffer overflow.", "id": "GHSA-5hfx-qqxc-xf62", "modified": "2022-05-01T18:01:28Z", "published": "2022-05-01T18:01:28Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-2224" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2007/ms07-043" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A1248" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/26449" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/476527/100/0/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/25282" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1018560" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA07-226A.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/2867" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.